The third party cyber risk management solution

first_img 21SHARESShareShareSharePrintMailGooglePinterestDiggRedditStumbleuponDeliciousBufferTumblr So, you have identified your top partners.  You have thoroughly evaluated their cybersecurity services in order to keep your members’ financial data safe and secure. But before you sit back and relax, you have to ask yourself “what about tomorrow?”The Pitfalls of Traditional Evaluation Methods for CybersecurityTraditional methods of evaluating your partners may include detailed questionnaires and conversations, audits, and maybe you have even conducted some vulnerability scans. These are all sound methods for establishing whether your partners are on the right track, but they are only a start. continue reading »last_img

Gone but not forgotten: Notable Bay Area residents who died in 2018

first_img(CLICK HERE, if you are unable to view this photo gallery on your mobile device.)Several notable Bay Area residents passed away in 2018. They come from all corners of the region and all walks of life. The one thing they all have in common is the legacy they leave behind. Here are their stories.Leon Fox, Jan. 4: The longtime judge presided over cases in Santa Clara County Superior Court for decades. He was 77.Priscilla Elder, Jan. 7: The onetime “Rosie” who worked at the Kaiser shipyards …last_img

Ohio Soybean Council Foundation awards $47,500 in scholarships

first_imgShare Facebook Twitter Google + LinkedIn Pinterest The Ohio Soybean Council Foundation (OSCF) is pleased to announce the scholarship recipients for the 2018-2019 academic year.This is the eleventh year for the OSCF Scholarship Program, which was created to encourage undergraduate students to pursue degrees in one of the many academic fields that support the future of the soybean industry including agriculture, business, communication, economics, education, science and technology, as well as to support ongoing graduate-level research. Since 2008, the OSCF scholarship program has awarded $310,000 in scholarship funds to students studying agriculture or a related field at Ohio colleges or universities.Undergraduate scholarships of $3,000 each were awarded to Wyatt Jones, Tanner Matthews, Kayle Mast, Abby Motter and Mikayla Storck.  A $1,500 scholarship was awarded to Monica Pennewitt as she will be graduating in the winter of 2018.  The annual $3,000 FLM Harvest Scholarship, awarded to students in the field of agriculture communications or business, was awarded to Lea Kimley. The annual $5,000 Bhima Vijayendran Scholarship, named in honor of a Battelle research scientist who has made tremendous contributions to the soybean industry, was awarded to Matthew Klopfenstein. The Robinson W. Joslin scholarship was awarded to Rex Tietje. The annual $3,000 scholarship was created to honor a long-time leader in the soybean industry both in Ohio and nationally, who passed away in May of 2016.Graduate scholarships of $5,000 were awarded to Will Hamman, Emma Matcham, Krystel Navarro, and Linda Weber.“Congratulations to the 2018-2019 OSCF scholarship recipients,” said Bill Bateson, OSC board member, soybean farmer from Hancock County and scholarship selection committee member. “These students are bright and have already contributed to the success of the soybean industry. We cannot wait to see what they do in the future.”  Undergraduate Winners:Wyatt Jones of Salem, Ohio is a junior at the Ohio State University studying Agriscience Education.Lea Kimley of South Charleston, Ohio is a junior at the Ohio State University studying Agriculture Communication.Matthew Klopfenstein of Haviland, Ohio is a junior at the Ohio State University studying Agricultural Engineering.Tanner Matthews of Ohio City, Ohio is a sophomore at the Ohio State University studying Agricultural Systems Management.Kayle Mast of London, Ohio is a sophomore at Wilmington College studying Agronomy.Abby Motter of Mansfield, Ohio is a junior at the Ohio State University studying Agriscience Education.Monica Pennewitt of Wilmington, Ohio is a junior at the Ohio State University studying Plant Pathology.  Mikayla Storck of New Carlisle, Ohio is a junior at the Ohio State University studying Agribusiness and Applied Economics.Rex Tietje of Deshler, Ohio is a junior at the Ohio State University studying Agricultural Systems Management.  Graduate Winners: Will Hamman of Columbus, Ohio is pursuing his Master of Science in Horticulture and Crop Science at the Ohio State University. His research consists of two major segments, one focusing on seeding rates for different management zones and zone delineation. A second part focuses on how soybeans change their plant architecture as well as how changing the seeding rates affect harvest loss and combine fuel use when soybeans are harvested.Emma Matcham of Columbus, Ohio is pursuing her Master of Science in Agronomy at the Ohio State University. Emma is determining which components of field variability have an impact on ideal seeding rate. She is also looking at how to delineate homogenous zones based on those variables and how to set seeding rates for each zone.Krystel Navarro of Wooster, Ohio is pursuing her Doctorate in Plant Pathology at the Ohio State University. Her research uses an amplicon-based metagenomics approach to study oomycete populations in Ohio and to determine the effects of environment, agricultural practices, soybean cultivar, and soil physical properties in species diversity and abundance.Linda Weber of Wooster, Ohio is pursuing her Master of Science in Plant Pathology at the Ohio State University. Her research is focused on the management of soybean diseases, mainly through studying the effectiveness of host resistance. Her research also involves several other disease issues, from preventing the spread of fungicide resistance to the screening of soybean cultivars for resistance to a certain set of pathogens.last_img read more

Plenty to ponder as planting progresses

first_imgShare Facebook Twitter Google + LinkedIn Pinterest By Doug Tenney, Leist MercantileFieldwork for much of Ohio finally returned the second week of April. Producers were aggressively applying fertilizer and spraying herbicides for corn and soybeans. In addition, repairing dreaded tile blowouts as well as installing new tile were in the mix of work being completed. Corn and soybean planting was taking place in very small amounts as evidenced by the April 9 weekly Crop Progress Report as it detailed planting progress across the country. This report had U.S. corn planted at just 2%, matching the five-year average. To no surprise, this report had zero corn planted in Iowa, Nebraska, Illinois, Indiana, Minnesota, and South Dakota. The European and American weather models were in huge disagreement in their weather forecasts for the last half of April. The American model indicates a warmer and drier outlook. In sharp contrast, the European model has showers continuing for that timeframe for the Delta, central Midwest, and eastern Midwest. It also indicates rainfall amounts for areas of the Midwest could reach 200% of normal.Corn and soybean weekly export sales the second week of April were disappointing and below trade expectations. Corn sales were 21.5 million bushels, just above those of the previous week. However, soybean sales were just 9.9 million bushels, down 86% from the previous week. The April 9 Supply and Demand Report cut U.S. wheat exports 20 million bushels. Egypt — traditionally an active buyer of U.S. wheat — passed on our wheat as it was sourced elsewhere. The same report also reduced corn demand in three lines, with corn fed to livestock reduced 75 million bushels to 5.3 billion bushels, corn exports were cut 75 million bushels to 2.3 billion bushels, while corn used for ethanol was cut 50 million bushels to 5.5 billion bushels.The May 10 Supply and Demand report will include numerous changes. Specifically, price range forecasts will be eliminated and replaced with single price points for all crops and livestock, international crop tables  will include an aggregate value for “World less China,” countries, and lists of major importers/exporters will be updated to eliminate outdated aggregations such as “Former Soviet Union,” to better reflect current trade patterns according to the USDA website.The April 12 Commitment of Traders Report had managed money short 71,000 contracts of soybeans as traders continued their months long pattern of being short corn, soybeans, and wheat. They were short 272,000 contracts of corn, a new record. The big shorts continue to flaunt they have no reason yet to exit their huge short positions in corn, in spite of what appears to be less than excellent planting conditions as weather across much of the Midwest looks to see less than ideal amounts of corn getting planted the last two weeks of April. Typically managed money has not been short the grains during the spring timeframe.There continues to be promise that China could be buying quite a bit of U.S. corn the next few years if a U.S./China trade deal ever gets done. As of mid-April there is still no sign of a completed trade deal in spite of being weeks past a March 1 deadline announced months earlier by President Trump. U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin as of mid-April continues to report good progress being made in the ongoing trade talks between the U.S. and China. We can only hope a final agreement is one fantastic deal for U.S. agriculture. If it is not, it will only add to the sharply bearish sentiment, which seems to permeate the landscape today for grains.A mid-April snowstorm in the upper Midwest provides yet another huge weather event following the March snowstorm and heavy rains which flooded portions of Nebraska, Missouri, and Iowa. Late March satellite images indicated at least one million acres still under water out west. Those factors along with April rainfalls strongly suggest U.S. corn acres could decrease while soybean acres could increase. A much better handle on actual plantings should be seen by June 1.last_img read more

Cloud Computing Security: What The Big Guns Have In Store

first_imgTop Reasons to Go With Managed WordPress Hosting The RSA Conference is the event for news to spill over with talk about cloud computing security.Let’s take a look at some of the announcements from the major players in the market, including Intel, Novell and Cisco.Intel, RSA, VMware and the Trusted ServerAccording to Dark Reading, the companies demonstrated a proof-of-concept for “building security into the cloud computing infrastructure.”The companies are playing on the white listing concept, which has gained wider acceptance in the security world. The idea being that if a server is trusted or white listed then it will be far less vulnerable to malware attacks:“At the heart of the PoC is a hardware “root of trust,” which uses Intel’s Trusted Execution Technology (TXT), which authenticates each step in the boot process of a system, verifying the hardware configuration, initializing the BIOS, and launching the hypervisor. It basically ensures physical and virtual environments aren’t tampered via malware or other malicious activity. Intel’s upcoming “Westmere” processor, which will be announced in two weeks, will support this capability, says Kirk Skaugen, vice president of the architecture group and general manager of the data center group at Intel.”Novell and the Cloud Security AllianceNovell is teaming up with the Cloud Security Alliance to push standards for cloud computing. The effort is called the “Trusted Cloud Intiiative.” According to Information Week, Novel will develop standards for cloud security, compliance, identity management and other related issues.Cloud computing is essentially a world with no standards whatsoever. Everyone has different meanings for the fundamental aspects that are a part of cloud computing. That leaves the customer with little way to fully understand what they are committing to with a cloud vendor. In its second year, The Cloud Security Alliance consists of technology companies seeking to develop use cases about the processes and practices around cloud computing security.Cisco: Developing Mobile Phone SecurityCisco is developing an “always on” security system for mobile devices. According to Computerworld, the service would give enterprise managers the ability to control cloud-based applications on an employee’s mobile device.ComputerWorld:The service…”would allow a business to establish an always-on VPN connection that would “automatically log you in” and “maintain session state.”This new VPN client on the mobile smartphone and other types of computers would be the means to also establish policy controls to set restrictions on Web browsing, prevent unauthorized transmissions of sensitive data through data-loss prevention filtering, and provide automated access to cloud-based applications, as well as a way to de-provision use of applications, if needed.” A Web Developer’s New Best Friend is the AI Wai… Why Tech Companies Need Simpler Terms of Servic… alex williamscenter_img 8 Best WordPress Hosting Solutions on the Market Related Posts Tags:#Announcements#cloud#cloud computing#events last_img read more

US Women Are Stronger In The Tennis World Than US Men

American men’s tennis is at a nadir. No Grand Slam singles champion in 11 years. No Grand Slam singles semifinalist in over five years. The U.S. Open unfolding now in New York is the 12th straight Grand Slam without an American man in the quarterfinals, and the seventh of the last eight with none in the fourth round.1The only active American man to even reach a major semifinal is Robby Ginepri, who is 31 and ranked 204th in the world.American women’s tennis is led by the No. 1 player in the world, Serena Williams, who has won 17 Grand Slam titles and remains the favorite to win the U.S. Open for the third year in a row.I wondered, though: Are the American women a stronger force in world tennis than the American men are? Beyond Serena and Venus Williams — who are 32 and 34 years old, respectively — are the women any deeper and stronger than the men?To check, I downloaded the latest singles rankings from both the men’s ATP World Tour and the women’s WTA tour — every player in the world who has a professional ranking point, even just one.As of Aug. 25, the start of the U.S. Open, there are 2,232 ranked men and 1,323 ranked women. About one in 12 of the ranked women are from the U.S., more than from any other nation (Russia trails narrowly). U.S. men make up one in 16 of all ranked professional players, tied with France for most in the world.Counting ranked players is a pretty rough gauge of national tennis strength. A player outside the Top 500 will appear in few tour events, let alone Grand Slams. Getting a ranking can be a product of opportunity as much as merit. An American player who’s just as good as, say, an Algerian player lives much closer to events where he can earn points, and therefore doesn’t have to spend as much to play.So I went beyond merely counting ranked players and added up the ranking points for each nation. This is a decent proxy for how much money players have earned in the sport, because ranking points generally scale with earnings. The bigger the tournament, the more points and dollars are available; and the further a player advances, the bigger a piece of the pie she earns. By this math, Serena Williams’s 2,000 points for winning the U.S Open last year — which still counts in the latest 52-week ranking — is worth slightly more than No. 24 Sloane Stephens’s cumulative tennis accomplishments in the last year. And Serena’s annual achievements are worth about five Sloanes in national tennis strength.That feels about right. Having lots of Top 100 players is nice in the first couple of days of a Grand Slam tournament. Having one player who can consistently reach the last couple of days of a Grand Slam is much nicer.Here, the U.S. women dominate their peers, and their male counterparts. They hog 12 percent of the world’s female tennis talent — half again as much as runner-up Russia. The U.S. men have just 5 percent of global male talent. The U.S. trails four European nations — Spain, France, Serbia and Switzerland — that combined have less than one-half the population of the U.S.Just five years ago, American men and women were much closer in their global tennis standing. American men held 8 percent of tennis ranking points, compared to 10 percent for women. The women have rebounded slightly while the men have lost ground.American men’s tennis boosters can point to a few reasonable explanations. First, the men’s long-term slump is less precipitous than the women’s. I checked by downloading pre-U.S. Open rankings data from the ATP and WTA websites for prior years, with major help from my colleague, Paul Schreiber. At this stage of the season in 1999 — the first year for which WTA ranking data is available on the WTA website — American women commanded 21 percent of global tennis power. American men held 11 percent. The men have narrowed the gender gap even as they have fallen further behind the rest of the world.2Any comparison can look different depending on which dates we choose to start and end with. The U.S. men’s slow decline over the last 15 years followed a crash, from 26 percent heading into the 1990 U.S. Open and 18 percent in 1994.Globalization also has brought more competition to the men’s game. Over the last few decades, the sport’s footprint has expanded further beyond the traditional bases in the four Grand Slam-hosting nations (the U.S., U.K., France and Australia). This is particularly so in the men’s game. That’s partly because of unequal opportunities; many countries still haven’t given girls the same chance to play sports as boys, or have done so only recently. Economic incentives have also favored the men: The Grand Slams equalized pay only seven years ago, and many other tournaments still pay men more than women. There also are more men’s professional events, which helps explain why there are more ranked male players than female players.The result is that 104 countries have ranked men, compared to just 79 countries with ranked women. That represents an increase of 14 countries from this time in 1999 for the men, but a rise of just four countries for the women.American women also are competing with fewer talent bases around the world. Russia is the only other country with at least 5 percent of the world’s ranked women. Three other countries besides the U.S. have a share that big of all ranked men.Another way to understand the men’s relative struggles is that the Williams sisters might be outliers who skew the whole comparison. Their story often has been described as one of the most remarkable in sports history, and rightly so. Their parents, Richard Williams and Oracene Price, trained them at a very young age with the goal of making each the No. 1 player in the world. Their daughters each achieved that audacious goal, and did so outside the well funded national centers. They have remained so good, past the age that most other women’s greats retired, that they account today for more than one-third of all U.S. women’s ranking points.What if the Williams family had never picked up tennis rackets? Then U.S. women would account for less than 8 percent of global talent today, much closer to their male counterparts.3Comparable earlier figures are 5 percent before the 2009 U.S. Open, 13 percent in 2004 and 17 percent in 1999. American women other than the Williams sisters have rebounded slightly after a steep decline. That group includes a number of young players who could one day enter the Top 10 but so far have performed inconsistently, including Stephens, Christina McHale and Madison Keys. None of them — nor the other three American women who rank behind the two Williams sisters but inside the Top 50 — reached the third round of the U.S. Open.4Remove John Isner and Donald Young, the top two American men, from the sport and the U.S. men’s share of global pro tennis power drops just one percentage point, to 4 percent.Here’s an even more outrageous hypothetical: What if Richard and Oracene had trained two young sons instead of daughters, and Jupiter and Steve had the same success that Venus and Serena have had? American men would hog a greater portion of global tennis talent than American women would today.While that scenario is farfetched, it is rooted in the reality of a sport usually dominated by just a few superstars. Even when American tennis was much deeper than it is today, one or two singular talents carried most of the load for winning big tournaments and contending for No. 1. Jimmy Connors and John McEnroe gave way to Pete Sampras, Jim Courier and Andre Agassi. Those men won 41 of American men’s 46 Grand Slams in the last 42 years. Maybe it’s just a fluke that another player with that kind of talent hasn’t come around since Sampras and Agassi retired — or hasn’t played tennis.As it happens, Richard Williams, who is 72, has a two-year-old son. But if Richard has his way, Dylan won’t help pick up the mantle for the American men. “He’ll never be a billionaire in tennis,” Richard Williams said earlier this year. He wants his son to buy a gold mine. read more